Tests by Toxic-Free Future in 2018 produced similar results. Several groups have maintained that many major brands use packaging with PFAS and that testing at times showed extremely high levels.Ī 2017 study by the Massachusetts-based nonprofit research organization Silent Spring Institute found PFAS in almost half of paper wrappers and 20% of boxes from 27 fast-food outlets. They contend there are safer alternatives.
in compost or is incinerated where the chemicals can leach into groundwater or soil. Opponents of the practice argue the packaging poses a danger to consumers as well as the environment, since the waste ends up in landfills. Known as “forever chemicals” for their persistence in the environment, they have been used for decades to prevent grease, water and other liquids from soaking through wrappers, boxes and bags. McDonald’s later announced it would remove PFAS from all its packaging.Įnvironmental and health groups are pushing dozens of fast-food companies, supermarkets chains and other retail outlets to remove PFAS chemicals from their packaging. No one has time to cook anymore,” said Hampton who teamed with the environmental health advocacy group Toxic-Free Future to spearhead a petition drive last year that collected nearly 75,000 signatures. Knowing her three daughters and eight grandchildren ate their share of burgers and fries, she joined the national fight in 2020 to ban PFAS in food packaging. Hampton, who believes the contaminated water contributed to kidney problems she and other residents suffer, soon learned the chemicals were found in another source that hit close to home - fast-food wrappers, boxes and plates. BOSTON > Brenda Hampton first came across the toxic industrial compound PFAS after finding it was part of the cocktail of contaminants that tainted the drinking water in her North Alabama community.